客戶對环氧地坪工程平整度檢測方法

环氧地坪漆施工是否平整是直接影響到它的使用價值的，所以在施工當中非常的重要，不過有一點也是我們比較擔心的，就是這種环氧地坪從表面上看是很難看出它是否平整呢？那麼這種环氧地坪的施工到底應該如何去判斷呢？就讓小編來告訴大傢。环氧地坪的平整度檢測主要有兩種方法。一種是我們常規使用的方法，通過使用靠尺來丈量环氧地坪平整度。一般為2米靠尺，2米范圍內落差不超過5mm。
Epoxy floor paint construction is a direct impact on its use value, so it is very important in the construction, but one thing we are more concerned about, is this kind of floor from the surface is very difficult to see whether it is flat? Then, how should the construction of epoxy floor be judged? Let Xiaobian tell you.
There are two ways to detect the evenness of epoxy floor. One is our regular method of measuring the smoothness of the floor by using a ruler. It is generally 2 meters in length and within 2 meters, the difference is not more than 5mm.
鋪在地面上，取最高地和最低點，看落差是多少。
Lay on the ground, take the highest and lowest point, and see the difference.
但用靠尺的方法檢測地面的平整度，會存在一些缺陷。如圖：
However, there will be some defects in measuring the flatness of the ground by using the ruler. Figure:
當碰到多處落差地段的時候，靠尺法無法表達，並且假如多處落差都小於5mm，那用靠尺法是通過檢測的，但實際地面的平整度是不行的（波浪紋）。
When it comes to a lot of falls, the ruler method can not be expressed, and if many falls are less than 5 mm, then the ruler method is used to detect, but the actual ground flatness is not (wavy).
另外一種重慶环氧地坪平整度的檢測方法是美國混凝土協會和加拿大尺度協會聯合推出的F數值。這個檢測方法有兩個數值，FF為平整度，FL為高差值
Another test method for the flatness of epoxy floors in Chongqing is the F value jointly developed by the American Concrete Association and the Canadian Scale Association. This detection method has two values, FF is 透水地坪flatness and FL is high difference value.
F數值一般的寫法是 FF / FL 。如：FF 25 /FL 20 。
The F value is generally written in FF / FL. For example, FF 25 /FL 20.
因為F數值能更正確的表達地坪的平整度，所以在超平地坪中常常使用。但因為F數值的檢測方法比擬靠尺法更復雜，並且环氧地坪的平整基本是順平，沒有太多的平整度糾紛，所以當前使用最廣泛的還是靠尺法
Because the F value can express the evenness of the floor more accurately, it is often used in the super flat floor. But because the F value detection meth彩色沥清地坪od is more complex than the rule method, and the epoxy floor is basically smooth, there are not too many flatness disputes, so the current most widely used still depends on the rule method.